A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and also the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly developed, is in the right posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute during the lawful timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the region as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all performs have been performed dependant on Skilled assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as built complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend René Collier outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.