A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members household at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Moments post about René Collier as well as Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek to construct their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-higher water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which includes considering the fact that become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that many observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been associated with area advocacy on setting up and environmental problems, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings carry on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long following the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties including environmental security and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue Paul Feely on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.